Petra Hule vs Merna Refaat Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 20 May at 10:21 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Hule vs M. Refaat

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

EGY
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hule 1 - 0 Refaat
They have played 2 sets in total, with Petra Hule winning 2 and Merna Refaat winning 0. The last match between Petra Hule and Merna Refaat was at the W50 Pelham, 20-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Petra Hule getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hule | 1 |
| Refaat | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W50 Pelham(05-20-25)
P. Hule vs M. Refaat H2H Profile
P. Hule vs M. Refaat Match Preview:
- Hule has performed slightly better on their second serve recently, winning 36.81% of points compared to Refaat's 34.78%. Could this minor edge give Hule an advantage?
- In returning games, Hule has excelled by winning 51.79% of their opponent's second serve points and 32.55% of first serve returns, outshining Refaat’s 45% and 18.52%, respectively.
- Under pressure, Refaat saves 50% of breakpoints, surpassing Hule’s 44.27% save rate. Could Refaat's ability to save breakpoints influence the match outcome?
- Hule has maintained a win rate of 55% over the past year, slightly higher than Refaat's 50%. Is this consistency a sign of Hule’s potential success in this match?
- Clay is Hule’s best surface with a 59% win rate, whereas Refaat thrives on indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate. However, their worst surface performances differ, offering tactical insights.
- Hule typically competes at Challenger level, winning 55.93%, while Refaat mainly plays Futures events, winning 44.44%. How will the difference in competition levels impact the match?
- Recently, Hule has faced tougher opponents (average rank 368.35) compared to Refaat’s (average rank 452.72), potentially sharpening Hule’s competitive edge.
- In deciding sets, Hule has clinched victory 47% of the time, far exceeding Refaat’s 25%. Will stamina play a decisive role if the match reaches that stage?
- Break point conversion strongly favors Hule, who has capitalized on 52.63% of chances, while Refaat has failed to convert any. How crucial might this statistic be as the match progresses?
Editorial Prediction (May 20, 2025, UTC):
In analyzing recent form and statistical patterns, Hule demonstrates overall superiority. Although both players exhibit strengths and weaknesses, Hule's slight edge in second serve performance and return game efficiency signifies a potential tactical advantage.
While Refaat excels in breakpoint saves, their inability to convert breakpoints, juxtaposed with Hule’s commanding conversion rate, might prove detrimental. Additionally, Hule's experience against higher-ranked opponents and stronger performance in deciding sets hint at a mental and physical resilience that could be decisive.
Considering the data, Hule emerges as the favorite for this upcoming match, driven by their consistent performance metrics and competitive experience. The prediction leans toward a victory for Hule, contingent upon maintaining current form and leveraging their statistical advantages effectively.
Petra Hule vs Merna Refaat Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Hule vs M. Refaat H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:39:2 | Average Match Time | 1:39:2 |
| 60% (53/88) | 1st Serve % | 60% (34/57) |
| 55% (29/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 38% (13/34) |
| 40% (14/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (7/23) |
| 53% (8/15) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (5/15) |
| 65% (37/57) | Return Points Win % | 51% (45/88) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
P. Hule Recent Matches Played
M. Refaat Recent Matches Played

P. Hule vs M. Refaat Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.46% (106/100) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.32% (106/118) |
| 51.73% (239/223) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.10% (240/259) |
| 51.00% (2141/2057) | Games Win/Loss | 48.76% (2202/2314) |
| 51.01% (76/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.02% (79/70) |
| 59.38% (19/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 34.72% (25/47) |
| 41.67% (5/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 46.15% (6/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 209 | Aces Total | 107 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.52 |
| 766 | Total Double Faults | 1154 |
| 1:24:46 | Average Match Time | 1:22:31 |
| 425.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 452.94 |
| 69% (8316/11998) | 1st Serve % | 61% (7102/11731) |
| 59% (4948/8316) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (4070/7102) |
| 43% (1585/3682) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (1839/4629) |
| 50% (731/1466) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (799/1628) |
| 46% (5392/11692) | Return Points Win % | 48% (5712/11995) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 52.75% (96/86) | Challenger W/L | 56.86% (29/22) |
| 47.62% (10/11) | Futures W/L | 45.03% (77/94) |
| 51% (104/202) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (104/220) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (18/39) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 70% (23/33) |
| 46% (23/50) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (25/55) |
| 89% (104/93) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (109/96) |
| 11% (104/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (109/12) |
| 13% (102/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (115/10) |